What is the best - or Chi FHI Flat Iron

WHO and FHI irons are the most sold to date, this utility comes with some similar characteristics, and compared. With its outstanding quality and exceptional performance, have not reviewed as a means of styling hair by popular and top clients around the world emerged. Both are available in a wide plate of similar size and provide fast heating and heat retention characteristics that help styling in no time. BothShares some similar advantages, if your hair. We discuss some of the important role of both CHI and FHI have models in this article.

Comparing exceeds what the other is a difficult thing, because both have similar characteristics in many aspects. The width plate similar to these rods is to be discussed first. If the turbo ¾ Farouk CHI styler is produced by a plate with the "7 1" and 2 "plates, 1", 1 ¼ "and 1 is the width of the slabsFHI. The quality and longevity is to provide an additional factor in their design are compared. When comparing the design documentation for the WHO appears to be slightly better than the FHI. This is because the CHI styling tools, while a particular offering ergonomic and robust handling. So build the CHI FHI is higher than that.

If the heating time of two compared to this plan, and provide resultsone thing at a time. This is because both the CHI and FHI models come with a plate made of flash heating function, which allows people to be heated quickly and thus help to complete the task in seconds. This avoids the need for prolonged exposure of hair to heat. Another similarity between them is the presence of a professional cordless swivel 360 degrees, which helps to eliminate the complications and offer a friendly and attentive style. They are provided with convenient handlecomfortable style.

The Turbo CHI only uses 20-25 watts, and FHI uses 58 watts. Thus, compared with FHI, WHO uses less energy. But CHI FHI cheaper.